Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janette McBride


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is for the article to be retained. North America1000 02:02, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Janette McBride

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete: non-notable former actress/talk show host. Quis separabit? 11:03, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 01:45, 22 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep - Enough sources are available attesting to notability.--Jondel (talk) 11:23, 25 September 2015 (UTC) @Jondel's vote is meaningless. He has been twice accused of stalking this nominator's AFDs and "Enough sources are available attesting to notability" does not satisfactorily comply with Wikietiquette (as per WP:AFD, to wit: "Remember that while AfD may look like a voting process, it does not operate like one. Justification and evidence for a response carries far more weight than the response itself.")  Quis separabit?  02:00, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:32, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:32, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:32, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 07:30, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete unless sources are added to establish notability.   Gamaliel  ( talk ) 14:59, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Meets WP:NACTOR. Award-winning actress.--RioHondo (talk) 02:36, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Aside from the award and film roles. Some secondary sources: PEP, The Philippine Star, ABS-CBN News, Philippine Daily Inquirer, Manila Times (print index)-- O BSIDIAN  †  S OUL  08:48, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per - I'll admit some of those sources aren't brilliant but notability's certainly there, Meets BASIC. – Davey 2010 Talk 01:54, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Just to say that in my opinion some of the keep votes here are the reactive fallout from a dispute originating at the Tambayan WikiProject, and are absurd. McBride has four film credits to her name per IMDb, the last in 2006, and she has left the business (see Janette McBride shares why she turned her back on showbiz"). She does not meet the threshold for notability as an actress and to let the article stand is to lower our standards. Quis separabit?  02:00, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
 * You already said that above. Yes we know you've accused everyone from the Philippine WikiProject who watch WikiProject Deletion sorting/Philippines of stalking. Twice. You. Not "have been accused". You accused. It's irrelevant to this discussion.
 * Back to the point. Can you link me to the notability guideline that says only four film credits is not enough? Even when all of them are notable and one of them won her an award? I seem to remember WP:NACTOR #1 saying otherwise. And why does it matter exactly if she's retired? WP:Notability is not temporary.-- O BSIDIAN  †  S OUL  03:54, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Am I missing something here? ....What the bloody hell has your issues got to do with me or my !vote ? ... If someone presents sources that confirm notability then the most obvious thing to do is !vote Keep ? ...... – Davey 2010 Talk 05:23, 28 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep: Meets NACTOR, sources OK, adequate credits, award-winning.   Montanabw (talk)  06:20, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per . Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:48, 30 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.