Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janice Celeste


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 17:43, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Janice Celeste

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No obvious WP:BIO criteria for notability. In terms of general coverage, there is one Daily Mail article about her losing a bunch of weight as a grandmother and winning a beauty contest in New Jersey for married women. All other references are passing mentions. Like all of the articles created by this one's author, smells strongly of undisclosed paid-editing. OhNo itsJamie Talk 17:42, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 18:25, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 18:26, 25 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as there are simply no better signs of even a minimally better notable and improvable article here, nothing at all to suggest keeping. Notifying tagger . SwisterTwister   talk  06:01, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete So far none of the winners of the Mrs. America contest have been identified as notable, and the references included here do not seem to single this particular winner out above the others. If not paid editing, then certainly undisclosed WP:COI editing.   KDS 4444  Talk  06:10, 26 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment - This article's creator, User:Alwayssmileguys, has been indefinitely blocked for paid editing. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:34, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per above clearly fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO .Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:08, 27 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete, fails WP:BASIC. Sam Sailor Talk! 17:23, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't meet the notability standard based on what's in the article and what Google digs up. Alansohn (talk) 17:58, 27 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.