Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janis Maria Wilson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 01:59, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Janis Maria Wilson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notability Most people who claim to to a "model, businesswoman, actress, media and television personality" are apalling self-promoting nudniks, as is the case here imo. TheLongTone (talk) 16:18, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 00:48, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 00:48, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 00:49, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 00:49, 29 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. Coupla clues. Pageviews in hundreds. Image consistency. Norwegian top model. Sources like this one. Meets the WP:GNG. More sources here.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 14:07, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Page view stats for a new page are misleading. And the source you give looks trivial in the extreme: are any of the other 11 (!) google hits more convinvingTheLongTone (talk) 14:51, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Sources here and here. She modeled for Playboy. She was in a TV series Lilyhammer starring with Steven van Zandt (see here.) It was big news when she was personally attacked. Clearly meets the WP:GNG. Article revamped as per WP:HEYMANN.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 15:59, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment. Closing admin please note the article has been subject to much agenda-pushing in its brief life.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 20:11, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment. Since learned Wilson did not pose for Playboy, only turned down an offer, supposedly. Changing to Weak keep partially as a result; plus looks like this article (if it stays) may quickly turn into an advertisement, based on the past contribution history.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 11:51, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Correct, she did not pose for Playboy. And the source here does not indicate she was given an offer. Rather contrary, she said: "I have not posed nude before, but for Playboy I would have done it 110 percent [for sure]." -- Sam Sailor Talk! 12:48, 3 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment: This article has also showed up on the Norwegian Wikipedia (I think it was there first), and it has been nominated for deletion there too. It appeares to have been made by the same user.--Telaneo (talk) 22:23, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
 * The article was deleted on Norwegian Wikipedia.--Telaneo (talk) 15:05, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
 * That has no bearing here, the argument is a reversed WP:OTHERLANGS. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 12:34, 3 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep - per WP:GNG and sources. --BabbaQ (talk) 21:46, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. Certainly not much substance in subject's career, but the sources to support GNG are there. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 12:57, 3 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.