Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janna Cachola


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 06:51, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Janna Cachola

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not meet WP:NOT, not notable in New Zealand or Phillipines. Does not meet WP:RS and probably self promotion as editor creating the article and removing the WP:PROD are not registered and have only been involved with this article. NealeFamily (talk) 09:45, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Seems promotional and may have been created by people close to her, and there's a wordpress site as reference? Already runs afoul of EL. --Eaglestorm (talk) 12:08, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:00, 9 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2012 April 10.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  07:08, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete no notability apparent from references or New Zealand context. I don't have the skills to search for Philippine context or non-English references, ping my talk page if they're added to the article. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:04, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Relevant to Philippine readers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiki9871434 (talk • contribs) 15:14, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment Wiki9871434 you and your friends need to declare your interest in creating the article WP:COIN and provide any information to support Cachola's notability. Calling something relevant without supporting evidence does not make Cachola notable. So far the only claim to notability is based on association with notable people and that doesn't count. Cachola looks like she is at the early stage of her career and may possibly become notable. Until she crosses the notable threshhold, she is outside the range for Wiki. Take a look at WP:NOT and WP:Notability (people) as it might prove helpful. NealeFamily (talk) 20:20, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment also looking at the recent sources added - you need to read Identifying reliable sources as well. Only two out of all those listed and recently added would be considered reliable. NealeFamily (talk) 02:40, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I do not wish to vote, but contrary to what was said here, she is not relevant to Philippine readers (if "Philippine readers" refers to readers residing in the Philippines). Not by a long shot. – H T  D  19:37, 14 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - note that the 2010-2011 round of productions of Miss Saigon was by local non-professional music theatre societies (who syndicate major items like set and costumes between them) and in no way would confer notability. dramatic (talk) 19:52, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.