Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jannat Pakistan Party


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 20:47, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Jannat Pakistan Party

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Another article created by indef blocked editor user:BiH, many of whose paid creations have been deleted or are currently under AfD. The sources are all either dead, unreliable, primary, blogs, or very fleeting mentions. Bluntly said, the references are the result of scraping the Internet barrel. Without better sources it fails notability per WP:ORG and is only one of hundreds of political parties in the country (one for every million population). Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:34, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete As another editor said in a related AfD. A promotional article by a paid editor is an advertisement . Advertisements are not appropriate for Wikipedia and should be deleted. J bh  Talk  00:42, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. --  1Wiki8 ........................... (talk) 16:21, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. --  1Wiki8 ........................... (talk) 16:21, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. --  1Wiki8 ........................... (talk) 16:21, 15 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete, of course with the caveat that someone with better local sources may turn up worthy references. I didn't find any. As one of the existing references says, Pakistan has 182 political parties, and this is one of them. Other than that, I didn't find any information that would show the relative weight of this party against the others. None of the existing references gives more than a passing mention of the subject. LaMona (talk) 17:03, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete for now Article lacks reliable sources.  sami  talk 23:00, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as I see nothing better here. SwisterTwister   talk  06:18, 18 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.