Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jannquell Peters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. consensus  DGG ( talk ) 00:36, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Jannquell Peters

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BLP of the mayor of a small town with a population of 33K. This is not large enough to hand a mayor an automatic presumption of notability just for existing, but the article is not sourced well enough to fulfill the "who have received significant press coverage" part of our inclusion criteria for local officeholders -- of the nine sources here, two are her primary source profiles on the websites of organizations she's directly affiliated with; two are glancing namechecks of her existence in articles that aren't about her; one is the alumni newsletter of the school she attended in childhood, which isn't a notability-assisting source; one is a mere blurb about her in a magazine; and one is a dead link whose content is entirely unverifiable. And of the two remaining sources that actually count as media coverage, both are in a community weekly newspaper rather than a major daily, and one is about the all-candidates debate rather than about her. Which means that there's only one source here that's actually reliable and independent and about her, and one acceptable source is not enough to make a smalltown mayor notable enough for inclusion all by itself. Bearcat (talk) 00:15, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 00:16, 15 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete though if more RS could be found I would be happy to change. Agree with nom, small town mayor, and not enough substantive RS to make her notable . I did a google search, she is mentioned in a few articles, but not in substantive sources.Deathlibrarian (talk) 02:11, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete mayor of a minor suburb, no show of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:30, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * delete sources found are local, trivial and routine. mayor of a small suburb.E.M.Gregory (talk) 13:24, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:23, 20 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete sources are local and trivial so the Mayor needs more coverage to have an article. --Frmorrison (talk) 17:27, 20 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.