Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janssen-Cilag


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. John254 17:25, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Janssen-Cilag

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Appears to fail WP:CORP. No coverage from reliable secondary sources. Ghits appear to be entirely press releases, promotional items, and corporate directory listings. Doctorfluffy 20:44, 31 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep or merge Google news gives 3,710 hits on the merged entity.  --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 21:29, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Typo? That link you provided yields 32 hits for me. Doctorfluffy 21:55, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Just click on "All dates" I left it displaying just the past years entries. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 23:27, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Ah okay, thanks. Doctorfluffy 00:23, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, has 330 employees just in Australia. Many google hits. I think it is a notable company. THE KING 23:23, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep the major national subsidiaries of the really most important international companies are notable. DGG (talk) 02:18, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Suprised at the current lack of secondary sources. This is pretty much J&J's drug and health products subsidary outside of the USA and Canada. If there is still is a lack of secondary sources, I would probably write an item up in J&J's article and redirect there. Spryde 17:15, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.