Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/January 2007


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 15:49, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

January 2007
This article was prodded but deprodded based on a comment on its talk page. The original prod reason, which I concur with, was: ''Crystal ball, user has created future months and dates before, and been told not to (See User Talk:Jose and Ricardo). (Microsoft entries are DEFINATELY crystal ball, from past experience.)'' Delete. Kimchi.sg 04:06, 11 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Confirmed information can go in to 2007 in order to consistent with WP's presentation of Calendrical information.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)   04:33, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Michael 04:36, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as Prodder. (And "wikistalker" of the creator of the article &mdash; by which I mean, I look at each of his edits, and decide whether it's helpful to Wikipedia, and act accordingly.  See the first section of User:Arthur Rubin/deletion candidates for some of his earlier work.)  &mdash; Arthur Rubin |  (talk) 16:41, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete or Merge per aeropatica and kimchi.sg Alphachimp   talk  01:37, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a Crystal Ball. Storm05 16:56, 13 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.