Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janumadatha


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (WP:NPASR). (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica1000 01:33, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Janumadatha

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:N, WP:V and the article is mainly relying on unreliable references i.e. Wordpress. ''' C ute st Penguin (Talk) 11:50, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ''' C ute st Penguin  (Talk) 12:00, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. ''' C ute st Penguin  (Talk) 12:27, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Kannada:
 * WP:INDAFD: T. S. Nagabharana K Musthafa Doddahullur Rukkoji


 * As it appears this brand new article can be sourced away from wordpress, why not simply tag it for issues and let them be addressed over time and through regular editing?... or at least suggest a reasonable redirect somewheres?  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 23:15, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔   14:55, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Rcsprinter123    (whisper)  @ 20:20, 22 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep with stub tag, and please withdraw your nomination. Nominating it for deletion only one day after its creation, especially without trying yourself to improve the article, is simply wrong and not in the spirit of how articles should be nominated. Look at WP:BEFORE. There are certain appropriate steps to be taken before nominating for deletion, and I see no evidence those items were tried or even considered. B2: "If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)" Those appear to be your three concerns, so there are your appropriate actions. All of the steps under C and D seem to have been ignored. Please do not nominate articles for deletion without doing your part first. Look for sources and try fixing it, and if the article is brand new, like this one, add a stub tag and leave it alone. Dcs002 (talk) 05:42, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.