Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Japan Presbytery - Cumberland Presbyterian Church


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. If someone wants to merge either page I will userfy it to them, J04n(talk page) 01:38, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Japan Presbytery - Cumberland Presbyterian Church

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is not a separate denomination, and presbyteries are not generally notable. StAnselm (talk) 11:52, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I am also nominating for exactly the same reason. StAnselm (talk) 11:56, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. StAnselm (talk) 11:58, 17 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete both. Not seeing any solid sourcing or in-depth coverage to demonstrate notability. --DAJF (talk) 13:45, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge both with their parent churches. Plausible search terms and real institutions.  JASpencer (talk) 21:36, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2013 May 18.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  20:35, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 19 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge to parent denominations. They appear to be constituted merely as branches of US churches.  Peterkingiron (talk) 15:23, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ymblanter (talk) 07:23, 27 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge to the parent article. They're just branches of churches in the US and thus have no individual notability. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 03:17, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - Lack of available reliable third-party sources fails WP:ORG. The reformiert-online.net directory does not seem to be an RS, though the creator of the article uses it on almost every article they create. Novaseminary (talk) 02:26, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.