Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Japanese and Chinese responses to imperialism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 09:56, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Japanese and Chinese responses to imperialism

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Vague topic; Orphan; no sources (only a general text); no Talk Page activity ch (talk) 06:04, 1 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - Original essay. Why are we linking Japan and China for starters? Are we talking about radical responses to their own national imperialisms, or national responses to the imperialism of outsiders? And what constitutes a response? Etc. Carrite (talk) 17:58, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - The text here is a rather simplistic view of a complex (and in this article not well defined) topic. The one and only reference is to a generic world history textbook that has had mixed reviews of its coverage of recent history. The scope of the article would need to be clarified (starting with the title) and all statements need to be referenced with reliable sources. The article doesn't even state which era of history that it refers to. --mikeu talk 20:03, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:23, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:23, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:23, 4 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - original research. -- Make  cat  13:29, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as being an essay full of original research. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 06:11, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.