Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Japanese translation note

From Cleanup: Japanese translation note trans. should be standard, possible vfd? -- PlatinumX

''It's already been here from that cleanup listing. You added it to cleanup on 16 March at 03:26 and RickK listed it here at 04:46. That time, ending 22 March, there were three votes to keep (Taku, Texture, Jamesday), two votes to delete (Jiang, Exploding boy), one person who listed with a question and no delete reason and didn't vote either way (RickK) and one person who possibly suggested a move to the Wikipedia namespace(+sj+). Looks as though RickK forgot to remove it from Cleanup after putting it here. Jamesday 18:54, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)''


 * Ask Taku why he made it. I think it could be incorporated into something else, but it is fine as it is now.  BTW, this has been on VfD before and no one agreed to delete it...  -- EmperorBMA / &#12502;&#12522;&#12452;&#12450;&#12531; 22:08, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * plenty of people voted to delete. please ask the admin who unlisted it to archive the deletion debate on the article's talk page in the future. i again support deletion. tips on reading wikipedia do not belong in the main namespace. --Jiang 07:42, 3 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * As many or more voted to keep. And that's how it's going this time as well - we've now accumulated one more different keep vote and one more different delete vote. Jamesday
 * Delete -- Cyrius | Talk 02:18, Apr 4, 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notes about how terms are translated are appropriate in the main article space because readers need to see them and confirm the term in the original language. Jamesday 18:54, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep - Shouldn't there be a minimum time between nominations for VfD? - T&#949;x &#964; ur&#949; 15:51, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep but only if there is some work on bringing some order and relevance to the list Chrissmith 10:50, Apr 14, 2004 (UTC)