Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Japoñol


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Whilst the redirect to the proposed band article is fine, the article still doesn't exist - so the obvious thing to do appears to be to delete this, and then re-instate it when the band article is written. If someone pings me when that happens, please? Black Kite (t) (c) 01:03, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Japoñol

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

unreferenced nn neologism Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 18:44, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey Chris--I did a little bit of sourcing. I will not dispute that the neologism is non-notable--but I propose I write a stubby stub for the band, which is notable enough (though not overwhelmingly so) and leaving this term as a redirect. Sources for japonol are found only in connection to this band; it's not an implausible redirect. Let me know what you think (on my talk, if you can). Drmies (talk) 20:19, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
 * That's fine by me, please have fun!--Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 05:37, 3 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Redirect per the above. If the term is associated with a notable subject, and has no other notable content, then a redirect is appropriate. You might also consider a redirect from the unaccented version, for ease of search. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 18:41, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.