Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaqueline


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. The article does now appear referenced sufficiently to demonstrate notability; those arguing to delete have failed to outline what the problem is with the references beyond the fact that they are in Norwegian. ~ mazca  talk 15:12, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Jaqueline

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Fails notability for the wikipedia. Fails WP:Music in every point. Goroth 18:40, 21 November 2010 (UTC) Speedy keep. The band has had significant coverage and good reviews in many major Norwegian newspapers. __meco (talk) 08:06, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above AfD was misformatted; I am just the person who reformatted it, not the nominator. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 18:40, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The band has at least one song (King's Table, which I believe was made by this band) on a somewhat regular rotation on P4 Bandit, but I am not sure if that counts as a major radio network. Ters (talk) 05:44, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- -- Cirt (talk) 07:49, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Do you have refs? Edgepedia (talk) 14:12, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * No, I'm just looking at the Norwegian-language article. Unless that is completely made up the band has had extensive coverage and reviews in the biggest Norwegian newspapers. __meco (talk) 08:46, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Now, with the work done by Ters to add references the article is dead strong. The headline for the review in Norway's second largest tabloid, Dagbladet reads "Norwegian Rock Debut of the Year". __meco (talk) 09:42, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Where the band shall have some revs? Delete 20:43, 23 November (CEST) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.233.172.44 (talk) 19:44, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Most links are red marked... It isn't a good omen for an article which shall have any relevance... User:Goroth 11:39, 27 November 2010 (CEST)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:14, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. meco (talk) 08:46, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I think I found the reviews mentioned in the article and have added them as references. Not sure if this was done right, though. I could not find the third review of their first album in one of the "three biggest newspapers". Ters (talk) 06:32, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:BAND. Snotty Wong   babble 19:54, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * How do you reckon a band with reviews in the country's three largest newspapers fails WP:BAND? It seems clear to me that the band satisfies the first criterion: "Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable and are independent from the musician or ensemble itself."__meco (talk) 20:59, 29 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment/Neutral It'd be nice if the sources were in English so those of us who don't speak Norwegian can verify the info. TomCat4680 (talk) 17:29, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per the significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. This article and this article from Verdens Gang, this article from Dagbladet, and this article in Dagbladet confirm that notability per Notability (music) is established. Cunard (talk) 08:11, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.