Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jared Siefert


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:05, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Jared Siefert

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Racing driver that has not competed in a fully-professional series. Fails WP:ATHLETE/Motorsport and WP:GNG. Drdisque (talk) 23:25, 24 June 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment The first three references, used for seven citations, came up not found. Hard to support notability, when there are only two working refs, one of which is subscription only.-- SPhilbrick  T  21:37, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:42, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - under 10,000 hits. T3h   1337   b0y  20:02, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Here's why I wrote the article: 1) He was a national champion. 2) There are 5 reliable sources in the article from 4 different sources. All are either reliable well-respected newspapers or regional/national level racing magazines. Sources were all valid when the article was written - so what if they aren't active today. That's why Linkrot was written. Per the guide "WP:Verifiability does not require that all information be supported by a working link, nor does it require the source to be published on-line." Ghits have not been considered a reliable standard for a long time. I've never had a subscription of any kind like this, so that link must have turned into a subscription-based. So it is an article about a national champion that passes WP:GNG.  Royal broil  23:53, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Weak delete - The links are still broken and while links aren't necessary, it helps to evaluate the depth of the notability. In this case, the link that is functioning, appears to me to be small scale localized coverage. I don't think it meets the ATHLETE criteria either, but some national or wider coverage could go the other way Shadowjams (talk) 01:38, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Appears to be semi-pro athlete on cusp of notability? Article requires further development and better referencing. Nineteen Nightmares (talk) 02:06, 1 July 2010 (UTC)Nineteen Nightmares
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.