Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jargonym


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Dakota 07:48, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Jargonym


Contested ProD. POV unverified/OR neologism dictionary definition. The talk page is full of laughable sockpuppetry. -- I sl a y So lo mo n  |  t a l k  18:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per sockpuppetry. Term returns 26 hits on Google. Chubbles 18:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, unsourced neologism. I'd expect to this to turn up on Google given the nature of the term, but nothing apart from a few meaningless blog/mailing list hits. Demiurge 18:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as hoax. The blatantly awful sockpuppetry on the articles talk page is eerily similar to sockpuppetry seen about a week or two ago on a number of other AfD articles surrounding made-up sports (I believe 'footbasket' was one...) --The Way 06:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The talk page seems to have some hilariously inept ventriloquism going on. "Gottle o' geer!"--Folantin 12:43, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Pointless dreck. Moreschi 13:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.