Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jarron Vosburg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Not yet notable per BIO. No prejudice to recreation if his career does take off. Black Kite 20:50, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Jarron Vosburg

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unsourced BLP. No notable roles, no reliable sources found. SummerPhD (talk) 23:48, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:29, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:ENT. Bit parts as Guy #1 and minor appearences don't add up to notability. Niteshift36 (talk) 08:06, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I went and did some expansion and sourcing to learn he grew up in Oak Ridge and has been involved in theater since before he was 10. Most of it is "local boy makes good" stuff. He's now about to enter his sophmore year at college in Los Angeles. His career may grow and the article might be welcomed when he makes a few waves on the west coast. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 19:19, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment His career may grow and he may make waves. If so, he would then become notable. As of July 2009, though, his career hasn't reached the point of being notable. - SummerPhD (talk) 17:19, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article has now been expanded and sourced. Notability has been assorted. GreenBayPackersfan09 (talk) 07:06, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment There is no meaningful assertion of notability. All of the known roles are minor, an unsourced claim of a future recurring role is not notable. Yes, it has been sourced: as with all actors, notable or not, he has an AMG page (proving he exists is not notable). He has small town press clippings in the "Oak Ridger" and a non-notable mention in a newletter of no import. Notability, asserted or not, simply isn't here. - SummerPhD (talk) 17:19, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No WP:RS evidence as to WP:N. "His career may grow" observation per User:MichaelQSchmidt above is WP:CRYSTAL - it may equally (or more probably, given the success rate of aspiring actors) not. Plutonium27 (talk) 19:16, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.