Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jarsaki Son


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 11:47, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Jarsaki Son
I suspect this is a hoax. Created by a new account, who also created three other hoax like articles. I could be wrong - but no ghits. Megapixie 04:10, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, no Ghits for ""Jarsaki Son" nokoyama," and since no references are provided, nothing here can be verified. -- H·G (words/works) 04:32, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Someone should just block the editor permanently, since it's pretty obvious that the account is only being used for vandalism. -- Captain Disdain 05:40, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, nn even if not hoax. NawlinWiki 12:01, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom.    Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  12:44, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. - (chubbstar)  — talk
 * Delete per nom, editor who created the articles is aware of the nomination for deletion (and removed AfD tags from the articles) so if nomination is incorrect he is welcome to speak up here. Neil916 23:34, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment If Wikipedia adopted a Limbo namespace, this article could be moved to Limbo during the discussion on deletion. Moving an article to Limbo would remove it from the article namespace and prevent search engines from delivering suspicious content while the community decides whether to keep or delete it. For more information, see the discussion on establishing the Limbo namespace. Fg2 02:07, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Even if the person is real (which I doubt), there's no merit in the article. Fg2 02:07, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions.   -- TheFarix (Talk) 02:42, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not only is "Jarsaki" not a Japanese name, it is not even possible to write in any Japanese script. Which rather leads one to suspect it's a hoax, ね? &mdash; Haeleth Talk 20:49, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
 * It's able to be written: ジャーサキ ... though the article is almost certainly a hoax. --Kunzite 20:34, 22 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nominator. Not notable, and possibly a hoax.  Yamaguchi先生 22:25, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as a non-notable hoax. TedTalk/Contributions 05:45, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable and hoaxy little article. RFerreira 20:49, 24 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.