Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jarvis Cocker's Stage Invasion


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was merge with Jarvis Cocker. I'll slap the tag on it. Woohookitty(cat scratches) 11:46, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

Jarvis Cocker's Stage Invasion
A single incident such as this is, IMO, not worthy of its own article, and this incident is already covered in brief under both Jarvis Cocker and Pulp (band) - delete. I don't believe that a redirect would be of any benefit, as anyone searching for details would surely search under "Jarvis Cocker". If it is felt that the coverage under the Jarvis Cocker article is inadequate, this information should be entered there, not here. CLW 16:02, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect. More information here than in Jarvis Cocker article.  --Stjarna 16:25, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep I remember this better than their songs. Should be retitled though.--MacRusgail 18:03, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment Sure, it was memorable, but does that really mean that it warrants its own article? ABBA winning Eurovision was just as memorable, but I don't think a The results of the voting for Eurovision 1974 when ABBA won it deserves its own article, just a mention within the ABBA article. Also, I think it would be impossible to give this a suitable name - the list of possibilities would be almost endless. CLW 18:36, 23 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Merge and Redirect per Stjarna's comments. This is probably the most well-known event in the career of Pulp or Jarvis Cocker to the public in general, and as it contains more info than the Pulp or Jarvis Cocker entries I believe the content is valuable. Powers of i 20:23, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with Jarvis Cocker. Capitalistroadster 23:56, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge. Kappa 02:02, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect; I can't imagine this incident being worth more than a sentence or two in the main article. MCB 04:04, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep; Take Sokal Affair as an example. That incident, a hoax too, deserves a separate entry from Alan Sokal. Why not this entry? Because Cocker is a pop star but Sokal's a scientist? --- Lee 11:35, 28 October 2005 (UTC +8)


 * Note - This comment attempts to give the impression of having been added by a signed-in user, but was actually an anon comment by user with IP 143.89.188.4. CLW
 * Reply - Thanks for pointing that out and sorry for giving you such an impression. But I wonder if I should address myself as "anonymous" or use my name. -- Lee 2:35, 31 October 2005


 * Keep; I think that neither the Pulp or Jarvis Cocker articles go into enough detail on this incident. tom, 16.04, 31 October 2005
 * Note - Another anon user (IP 86.132.227.141) formatting his/her comment to look as if it's being left by a signed-in user. CLW 18:04, 31 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete or Merge but No redirect. A merge is acceptable, but I do not see the point of a redirect here. Paolo Liberatore (Talk) 16:53, 2 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.