Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jase Harley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that the improvements to the article do not bring it above the notability threshold. ansh 666 20:02, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Jase Harley

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable musician. The sources in the article don't establish notability and nothing additional could be found in a Google search to support a claim. Alansohn (talk) 16:24, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  17:42, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  17:42, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  17:42, 10 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. Perhaps WP:TOOSOON; I'm unable to find sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG or WP:MUSICBIO at this time.  gongshow  talk  06:46, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. I've updated sources and added a short list of notable collaborations without being lengthy. Smartdata3 08:551, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep After the work by Smartdata, the article clearly passes WP:GNG. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 14:50, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: Smartdata is the article creator, but even so they have been unable to add much in the way of decent sources. First source is from a paid publicity site; second source doesn't mention the subject at all; third source appears to be a collection of music lovers writing about music, and who say on their home page that they will write about any artist who contacts them (hardly a model of impartiality); fourth source is simply a list of artists who use a particular piece of technology, Harley does not actually record for ROLI; fifth source is from a blog and doesn't actually state that Harley has made music for Ford; final source the editorial oversight is unclear. So with one dubious source and five clearly unreliable sources, the article fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO and I can't find better sources. Richard3120 (talk) 18:02, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
 * All sites listed are absolutely credible and reliable sources. Harley has clearly collaborated with ROLI and additional credible sources have been listed, including ROLI's portfolio of collaborations, featuring Harley next to other prominent artists. The article passes Smartdata3 00:08, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Miles Edgeworth Talk 02:42, 18 October 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Night  fury  12:21, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
 * In reply to Smartdata above, the sites might be credible, but they're not independent and substantial. Harley being featured "next to other prominent artists" is WP:INHERITED and not an indication of notability. The two references to ROLI are WP:PRIMARY, coming from the artist's and company's own websites – nobody independent has written about them. Furthermore, Harley's thanks to various companies for providing the furniture and decorations for the videos suggest that they were conceived purely as promotional videos for the company. Richard3120 (talk) 15:29, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 01:14, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:TOOSOON. Not enough evidence found from independent reliable sources to indicate significant notability as yet. That might change in the future. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 03:48, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. A failure of notability. - The Bushranger One ping only 05:40, 9 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.