Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jase Harper


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 05:28, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Jase Harper

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This seemed just over the line from speedy A7, but I really don't see any third-party coverage or notability on this topic. &mdash; Timneu22 · talk 13:10, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, going to go with "not notable" at this time. I thought that the Ledger Awards might get him over the line, but I can't find any reliable reference to him winning them, and the award's page (ledgerawards.org) seems to be down.  There's nothing else in the rest of the article as far as I can see which would have Harper meeting WP:CREATIVE, but I'd be happy to be contradicted on that.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 22:05, 13 May 2010 (UTC).
 * I haven't created this page lightly - Jase Harper seems to me to be a locally significant, if emerging, Australian comics (and media) artist. While the ongoing merit of The Ledger Awards may be debated, Harper won over a large field for "best comic" for a commercially published work.  He has been interviewed in various media, but finding and adding those references could be difficult.  I'd strongly argue to retain this profile for an Australian comics artist who is very active in all areas of the field.Ian T (talk) 01:10, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
 * It still needs demonstrating using reliable sources - if you can dig out the media interviews and add them then that'd be a big help with notability. (Emperor (talk) 00:54, 15 May 2010 (UTC))

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Shimeru (talk) 22:45, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Comment Second relist since it's a BLP. Shimeru (talk) 22:45, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. No sources for the main claim to notability, that he won the Ledger Wards. Also, very little Googlehits in general. -- Pink  Bull  22:51, 27 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. If as noted above that is an "emerging" talent, then I've certainly no prejudice to recreation when he has emerged.  But at this point, he doesn't meet the notability guidelines. -- Whpq (talk) 16:26, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.