Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jase Robertson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) TB randley  (T • C  • B) 07:04, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Jase Robertson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not separately notable from Duck Dynasty. Reliable sourcing is all tied to the show. WP:BLP1E. Redirects twice undone by author. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:43, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:13, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:13, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:13, 9 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep He is very famous. Surprised to find this here. He's involved in many projects apart from the show. And even if he wasn't starring on a hugely popular series would be enough. Candleabracadabra (talk) 22:40, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
 * What other projects? All I see for him is Duck Dynasty. Also, only one show isn't necessarily enough. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 23:52, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
 * He's a big celebrity. The show is in its third season. And apparently there was an earlier version of the show before that. The article will not be deleted. Trust me. This is a hugely popular show and he is one of its stars. And like other tv stars he has all kinds of side projects. Here's a bit about him, but the value seems dated. The business is also notable. And I am SHOCKED that Phil Robertson (a redirect), its founder and a true legend doesn't have his own article. Candleabracadabra (talk) 23:58, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Also, there's really no reason for a deletion discussion. There could be an argument made to redirect to the parent subject, but in this case an independent article is robustly warranted. Candleabracadabra (talk) 00:06, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
 * There is, if some other editor stubbornly refuses to let the redirect stand, and if another editor (myself) believes that he's a WP:BLP1E. What has he done that's not Duck Dynasty? I'm still not seeing it. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:12, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
 * oodles of very substantial coverage. Candleabracadabra (talk) 00:15, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Candleabracadabra, I find you to be right. By the way, I plan to create an article for Phil, as well as Si, Kay, and the rest of the Duckaholics (I did create one for Willie Robertson. I also think that the article Duck Commander needs badly to be expanded. As a response to you, User:TenPoundHammer, Jase Robertson is Involved with much more than Duck Dynasty. He is a preacher, professional hunter, COO, as well as inventor, charity worker, etc, etc. He does loads apart from the show. Carwile2 (talk) 01:11, 10 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep as subject easily crosses the verifiability and notability thresholds. WP:BLP1E only applies if "reliable sources cover the person only in the context of a single event" and starring in multiple seasons of one of America's highest rated cable shows is by no means a "single event". In addition, "WP:BLP1E should be applied only to biographies of low-profile individuals" and Robertson is anything but low-profile. - Dravecky (talk) 06:50, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep per WP:SK: "nominations that are clearly an attempt to end an editing dispute through deletion, where dispute resolution is a more appropriate course". And, as it happens, I need a new duck call since I lost the reed from my current one.  I shall invest in a "triple threat" and think of Wikipedia when I blow it. Warden (talk) 07:10, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.