Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jasen Walker


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 21:59, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Jasen Walker

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I left this one alone for quite a while hoping the tags would be addressed. The subject has a significant amount of published work but it does not appear to be at all covered outside of his small field. It is very much a resume and has no third party sourcing and appears to be an auto-bio. Beach drifter (talk) 03:34, 7 August 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:03, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep for now: This person does appear to be notable in their particular field, and a look at the list of his published works includes reputable professional journals and at least one state Worker's Compensation Guide. The tags were only posted a little over a week ago, and a look at the main author's contributions shows that they haven't edited anything since the tags were posted.  I agree with the statements that it appears to be a resume/CV and has some sourcing issues, but unsure about the auto-bio tag.  Let's leave this a little longer and give the author more than a single week to fix the issues this article has been tagged with. Frmatt (talk) 06:27, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- Cyber cobra  (talk) 01:28, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- Cyber cobra  (talk) 01:30, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Article reads like professional puff. Negligible impact found in Google sources. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:30, 14 August 2009 (UTC).
 * Delete. If WP:V is the standard, then he fails WP:PROF. Location (talk) 03:37, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No sign of significant coverage in reliable independent sources to meet WP:BIO. Style of article smacks of WP:PROMOTION of his business, CEC Associates. I note that the article was written by User:Dmcafee while the office manager of CEC Associates is Dina McAfee according to their website, suggesting a WP:Conflict of interest. Qwfp (talk) 16:58, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.