Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jasinski Flower


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. SarahStierch (talk) 17:03, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Jasinski Flower

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Looks like original research. There are many ways of generating interesting looking mathematical curves and it would need something more to make it notable. The first reference is a standard formula book and I'm fairly sure these are not mentioned. The second reference is a Polish paper I don't have access to. Salix (talk): 21:20, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. I also can't find any evidence that these are anything but original research. They don't seem to exist in Google scholar, in Google books, in MathWorld, or in the specific books and web pages cited as sources here (unless it's in the Russian one which I can't read). —David Eppstein (talk) 23:00, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:04, 1 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete as pure WP:OR. Not found at all in GBooks, GScholar, or even plain Google searches. -- 202.124.73.16 (talk) 01:28, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. linas (talk) 17:23, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - clearly OR. Gandalf61 (talk) 14:34, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - looks like OR to me, probably naming curves for friends as well. Bill Cherowitzo (talk) 22:58, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.