Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jasmine Sinclair


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  k eep. - Mailer Diablo 02:41, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Jasmine Sinclair

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable person. No coverage in secondary sources. Fails to satisfy either WP:BIO or WP:PORNBIO. Valrith 17:20, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. After seeing the additional work done by User:Epbr123, the article is certainly better sourced and I would say Jasmine is arguably notable. Tabercil 22:48, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. Citations have been provided, and she does seem to have won some awards. Weak since I'm not knowledgeable in the specific area. Note that User:Epbr123 is one of the most fervent WikiProject Pornography deletionists (just check his user page for his "successful hit list"), so if he thinks the subject is notable enough to be kept, that's almost notable in itself! :-) --AnonEMouse (squeak) 15:33, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. AnonEMouse (squeak) 13:54, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. According to the SIGNY award article, she seems to be one of the top 5 bondage models over the past few years. I think this and the Dean Gaffney newspaper article makes her just about notable enough. Epbr123 16:59, 10 May 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.