Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jasnies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:46, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

Jasnies
5 irrelevant Google results. Vanity. Delete if not Speedy. └Smith120bh/TALK┐ 03:40, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete -- King of Hearts 03:47, 22 December 2005 (UTC)


 * It has yet to recieve media attention but it is a real movement. That and it in no way eclipses other sites. (added signature 03:49, 22 December 2005 12.211.75.94)


 * Speedy -- Vary 03:56, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Vanity. Non-notable. ERcheck 04:00, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete not speedy. Significance is claimed but not proven. This is completely unproveable. Capitalistroadster 04:23, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Speeedy delete as vanity and non-notable. If the movement ever gets significant media attention, a new article can be written about it at that time. --Metropolitan90 06:48, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as vanity. Could speedy under new CSD A7, but article makes complete bollocks claim of notability. Jamie (talk/contribs) 11:34, 22 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.