Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Calacanis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy keep, bogus "nomination" by an unregistered user who made no attempt to present any argument for deletion. --Michael Snow 04:20, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Update: found the nomination, which was made on Talk:Jason Calacanis instead. I've combined that here, but it's still a bad argument supported only by a user who decided to disrupt things further by throwing in a bogus "father of podcasting" bit. --Michael Snow 16:41, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Jason_Calacanis
Pure self-promoting Vanity and questionable notability. 68.204.146.87 22:18, 8 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep - AFD put forward without any real discussion or attempt to improve the article, subject seems notable. Glowimperial 22:39, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I have no reason to suspect that the subject has edited or in any way contributed to this article other than the single edit in the past 24 hours. While the page certainly isn't critical of it's subject, marking the page for deletion seems absolutely uncalled for at this point.  The subject certainly appears to be notable - if you had issues with the article's POV, it would have been appropriate to edit the article or to create a discussion here on the talk page.  Right now it's hard to see the AFD as anything other than an attack. Glowimperial 22:38, 8 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete - Subject not notable. --GaeusOctavius 22:45, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Subject is quite notable. --Arcadian 22:51, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I hardly think the deletion is called for. He's created something of note in the world.  Hardly a candidate for deletion. User:66.108.52.28


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.