Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Calixto


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Nja 247 09:55, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Jason Calixto

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article on a likely non-notable individual with no sources. I could not find any information relating to the subject's participation within Thug Line Records. The "Web Development" section discusses a website that he built on a free webhost as well as his participation on a couple of online forums... scooteytalk 05:42, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: only 123 ghits and most of these are wiki mirrors and blogs, non-notable. JamesBurns (talk) 10:56, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note – This user has been blocked for sock puppetry and vote-stacking at AfDs. List of Confirmed sock puppets of User:JamesBurns Untick (talk) 14:01, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * See Sockpuppet investigations/JamesBurns/Archive. Matty (talk) 05:07, 20 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. —Bluemask (talk) 13:36, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, most likely a self-published work of fiction. --- Tito Pao (talk) 10:39, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:32, 26 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete No notability established, and the info given suggests that if that's as notable as he gets he's not notable enough for our standards. DreamGuy (talk) 02:50, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:03, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:03, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.