Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason David Frank (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep, all participants felt he was notable enough for inclusion (non-admin closure).  New England  Review Me!/ Go Red Sox! 20:59, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Jason David Frank
Profile of TV character, no longer notable by today's standards. PowerRangerHunter193 20:40, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep The article is about about the actor, not the character, and he is notable.Nate 20:47, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * delete —The preceding unsigned comment was added by PowerRangerHunter193 (talk • contribs).
 * Keep. This actor's career has indeed been discussed by nontrivial sources; he meets the notability criteria.  Notability is not time-sensitive; Frank Sinatra hasn't made any new music lately, either, but that doesn't mean we should delete him. -FisherQueen (Talk) 21:07, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep per above, as an obviously notable actor with 100's of appearances on a top-10 kid's Saturday morning show. The nom appears to be an error of judgment by a newbie with less than 10 edits. At least I am assuming that. Bearian 18:45, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
 * VERY Strong Keep per above. He is a VERY notable actor, a great martial artist (I would love to visit his dojo someday) and an awesome person. Angie Y. 00:09, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * VERY VERY Strong Keep per above. He's still active as an actor and by todays standards he IS notable. And as FisherQueen stated, notability is not time-sensitive. Personally I think this person has a dislike towards Jason David Frank for unknown reasons and figured he'd take out his frustration by trying to get his Wikipedia article deleted. As Bearian stated, it's an error in judgment by a newbie with less than 10 edits. Okay that's my last bit of "I agree with past reasoning." He's notable. Don't delete him. 'Nuff said. Maverick Leonhart (Talk | Contribs) 00:16, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Saying "very" repeatedly won't make your opinions more important. Probably the opposite in fact. Back on topic, keep. Falling off the scene does not matter, since past events still carry notability. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 06:49, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep He was a famous actor in the 90's and a prominent member of the crew of a popular kid's television show. Why on earth should this article be deleted. There are MANY more less famous actors on the pages of Wikipedia then this. - Samuraiman89
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.