Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Fisher


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-26 14:58Z 

Jason Fisher

 * — (View AfD)

This fellow is a Tolkien scholar who has written a number of chapters in the Tolkien encyclopedia. My knowledge of Tolkien scholarship is weak, but I can't see this article as meeting the threshold of notability for an academic. I compare it to the professor test, where we have full professors that still don't meet notability standards. Samir धर्म 07:42, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Seems not enough notable. The Tolkien Encyclopedia is not cited in Tolkien research, maybe an error.  Eventually can be merged to that article.  Also the two dogs (Max and Leo) are non notable!!!  Autobiography?  - Cate |Talk 15:03, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete unless notability can be better proved- the professor test comparison seems reasonable to me. --Scimitar 17:01, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Big  top  23:36, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's spam promotion, part of a hoax or just advertising:  His buddy's article was deleted already, Articles for deletion/Paul Telner and then recreated:  Paul Telner.  The show is up for deletion also:  Articles for deletion/APAULED.  Delete them all and all links and all redirects and protect them from recreation. Hu 05:14, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete He's a hobbyist, not an academic. And he has written 42 book reviews for Amazon.com in the last 2 months, which I think counts against him.DGG 03:34, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Low noteablity. Davidpdx 08:56, 26 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.