Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Geria


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Will userfy upon request. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:58, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Jason Geria

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

He has not played a professional senior game at club or international level. Article fails WP:NFOOTBALL. Also fails WP:GNG. Simione001 (talk) 07:45, 28 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 07:45, 28 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Userfy - then move back into mainspace if he becomes notable. Lukeno94 (talk) 12:56, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 16:02, 28 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL; can be easily restored if/when he becomes notable. GiantSnowman 16:03, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:38, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Govvy (talk) 23:34, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:24, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:24, 29 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - the article is about a footballer who hasn't played in a fully pro league or represented his country at senior level, which means that the article fails WP:NFOOTY. Also fails WP:GNG due to lack of coverage in reliable sources. No prejudice against recreation once one of the criteria is met. Mentoz86 (talk) 21:56, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.