Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Hannasch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Show-Me Institute with no prejudice against reverting if notability independent of Show-Me Institute can be established (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:33, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Jason Hannasch

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

non-notable vice president of the Show-Me Institute, a local organization, whose Wikipedia article, is also currently the subject of an AfD discussion. TommyBoy (talk) 04:25, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Just an average guy at the head of a local community organisation. Nyttend (talk) 13:39, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I suspect this should await the outcome of the Show-Me Institute AfD. I'd like to suggest merge and redirect to the Show-Me Institute if that article survives, and if not this should simply be deleted.— S Marshall   Talk / Cont  15:38, 26 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete: I can't find any news articles mentioning this person. All of the links seem to go to the Show-Me Institute, which is just his employer.  I don't think this should be merged either.  According to this article he is just a vice president, and there is nothing to show that he is notable enough to be included in that article. Locke9k (talk) 18:50, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:00, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep The organization has just been found notable by a SNOW close. DGG (talk) 23:15, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Just because his employer was found notable doesn't mean that he is. Or am I missing your point? Locke9k (talk) 23:39, 30 March 2009 (UTC)


 * of course not,but its enough to prevent too rapid a close in the other direction till we can check further. :). I remind you that argument for deletion seemed to emphasise the unimportance of the organization. Your're trying to have it both ways. DGG (talk) 00:22, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Again, not sure what you mean. In fact the organization was not found notable through a SNOW close - the nomination was withdrawn.  Not the same thing at all.  The point is that an employee of a notable organization is not necessarily notable themselves.  I haven't been able to find any significant independent coverage of this individual to show otherwise. Locke9k (talk) 03:31, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –  Juliancolton  | Talk 00:05, 31 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Redirect to the Show-Me Institute. The institute may be notable, but this guy is better shown in relation to his company.  It cuts down on the BLP problems that come with his borderline notability.  Them  From  Space  01:48, 31 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.