Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Horsley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:26, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Jason Horsley

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable BodaciousTattvas (talk) 20:16, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:24, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:24, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:24, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:24, 15 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete. Bio-spam. References to self-published books do not create notability.  Nothing from a material United Kingdom RS where he is the subject of the article/piece.  Doesn't even appear much in google which is unusual for a media-BLP.  Only that the article is so well referenced (with unsuitable refs), would be a WP:A7. Britishfinance (talk) 13:50, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete appears to be PROMO for a self-published writer on a wide variety of topics, some clearly FRINGE. Lacks SECONDARY sourcing. Fails WP:SIGCOV, fails WP:AUTHOR. Extensive self publishing ≠ notability. E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:48, 22 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.