Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Lee (artist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe deckertalk 01:35, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Jason Lee (artist)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't meet WP:NMUSIC - all but three of the "sources" are his Bandcamp page. Of the remaining, one is a blog, which fails RS, one is a portion of a daily article in DIY (which isn't good enough for significant coverage, as he's not even the lead article photo) and the last is not only in Spanish, but doesn't appear RS. Not a signed artist, so clearly not on a label of note and has no releases. Very likely a vanity article with sockfarm. MSJapan (talk) 04:21, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  09:09, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  09:09, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  09:09, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  09:09, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:40, 24 June 2016 (UTC) did you look at the two sources I left on the talk page when I deprodded this? ~Kvng (talk) 13:40, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
 * - I might ask you the same thing, because if you had, you would not have asked, for two reasons: a) those sources were already in the article's reflist, and b) I addressed them directly in the nom, specifically stating "DIY isn't good enough for significant coverage" and "An article in Spanish that appears to not be RS." MSJapan (talk) 17:57, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the response. I asked you because, as nominator, you're the one with the WP:BEFORE responsibilities. My WP:AGF with you on this has worn a bit thin. ~Kvng (talk) 22:29, 26 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Lacks significant coverage from RS. Spanish article appears on website where I could find no editorial policy. Gab4gab (talk) 13:47, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as I still am not finding anything else confidently and substantially better. SwisterTwister   talk  20:58, 1 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.