Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Love (humorist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 05:21, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Jason Love (humorist)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Smarmy bio or autobio (before cleanup) of a non-notable humorist whose column and cartoon are each carried by a handful of papers. Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  01:33, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:10, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:10, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:10, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:16, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Comment He doesn’t seem to be raising much of an interest either for or against, does he? It certainly looked like a self-bio as the tone was not encyclopaedic by any means before the mass edits. What drew my attention to this article was his name in List of Cartoonists being placed in the Notable cartoonists. He is not that notable to be in with such famous people and smacked of big headedness. His cartoons could allow him to be listed in the ‘Cartoonists of single-panel gag cartoons’. I personally look for something that stands someone out for an article, pointers being if they have a following, or are connected to something etc that would be of interest to a reader or someone that would look up this person. This “humorist” is very borderline for an article and a few cartoons in a couple of publications does not warrant immediate inclusion, in my opinion. --BSTemple (talk) 11:21, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:39, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete - I can not find significant coverage in reliable sources that discuss him. The sources currently in the article verify the information is true, but none of them are really independent of him.  They are either things he has published or interviews with him.  As far as I can find no one has written about him.  GB fan (talk) 21:01, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.