Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Motlagh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Seems like evidence of notability exists here, as noted by E.M.Gregory. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:51, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Jason Motlagh

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I still confirmed my removed PROD as although there were some improvements, still none of it is actually convincing to keep. SwisterTwister  talk  22:28, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  22:28, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  22:28, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep My search (Proquest) produced RS for several prizes in addition to secondary source coverage of his career and RS discussion of impact of his reporting.E.M.Gregory (talk) 16:17, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep 28k search results on Google; has reported from 40+ countries for numerous big-name media organisations. --Karam.Anthony.K (talk) 00:51, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment - However, none of that is actually establishing any independent notability. SwisterTwister   talk  02:43, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:30, 15 August 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:20, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep significant coverage and awards, has worked around the world for various media organisations. jcc (tea and biscuits) 21:02, 31 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.