Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Osborn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The general consensus here is that this person is barely notable at most. Kevin (talk) 23:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Jason Osborn

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

14 film scores in an unreferenced article created by the eponymous Jason Osborn looks to me like self puffery of a non notable jobbing composer. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 20:53, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:19, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. Dog  poster  21:05, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Very weak keep per WP:BARE. I did several searches and found some reliable sources -- a Times listing and one at filmscoremonthly.com, and a bulletin. I'm not certain if he ranks. Bearian (talk) 21:08, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Very weak delete - There are resonable sources, but one is just passing mention in a list. Almost, almost, makes the notability guideline, but the conflict of interest issue with the article's creator put me off, so delete, Lord Spongefrog,  (Talk to me, or I'll eat your liver!)  20:12, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Comment Despite this being listed for a reasonable time, no references have appeared in the article despite the eponymous creator having performed some work in it. This looks to me to be very much like an attempt to post a resum&eacute; on Wikipedia. If this person becomes notable one day then an article which is not a litany of show and film names will doubtless be created. It simply seems to me that he is not, yet, notable, but is seeking to establish notability with an article in Wikipedia. Whether he has worked in those films and shows is not the point. The point is notability coupled with verifiability. References are mandatory. This is an encyclopaedia. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 09:30, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.