Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Schmidt (photographer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 23:07, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Jason Schmidt (photographer)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

He doesn't appear to meet WP:BIO / WP:GNG, or have a suitable WP:ATD. Successful career for notable projects, but notability is not inherited. No suitable WP:ATD. Boleyn (talk) 12:51, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Photography and New York.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:52, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:15, 17 February 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  17:44, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. Alextejthompson (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 19:53, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. His website's about page conveniently lists a bunch of significant coverage.
 * Jfire (talk) 06:10, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Jfire (talk) 06:10, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Jfire (talk) 06:10, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep The references listed above seem to establish that he is an important photographer in his own right (not just by association with famous subjects he has photographed). There are at least three reputably published books of his work – which is also widely published in periodicals, exhibited and collected. As such, the article seems like one that should be kept and improved (perhaps by adding some of the above refs). -- Cl3phact0 (talk) 11:09, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep Agree with above points that the references listed suggest notability and the article could easily be improved. Editing84 (talk) 08:52, 26 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.