Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Stapleton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:25, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Jason Stapleton

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does this subject really meet WP:GNG (and other notability guidelines)? (t) Josve05a  (c) 20:24, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
 * See also Articles for deletion/The Jason Stapleton Program. --(t) Josve05a  (c) 20:25, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. (t)  Josve05a  (c) 20:27, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. (t)  Josve05a  (c) 20:27, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. (t)  Josve05a  (c) 20:27, 20 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Sourcing is currently very poor. No other sourcing suggests Stapleton has been the subject of multiple, independent, in-depth articles. AusLondonder (talk) 03:55, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - I don't see anything to indicate he meets the notability criteria, neither in the article nor in a News search: he looks like just another podcaster with a self-improvement program to push. --Gronk Oz (talk) 04:35, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Sources on the page is lousy.  I ran a gNews search,[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rape tree all notable contemporary political commentators will get lots ghits in such a search.  Stapleton got a handful of ghits on Libertarian websites such as  The Libertarian Republican, The Liberty Conservative, and Being Libertarian.   Plus a press release .  He does seem to have followers; doesn't have any sources to support notability. E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:39, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails GNG. A zillion links to Youtube is no different than no refs at all. And that's just about all he's got. South Nashua (talk) 19:31, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - every single one of the 18 citations and links are by him, not about him, thus it fails both WP:BLP and WP:RS. Bearian (talk) 20:27, 24 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.