Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Steed


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —  Aitias  // discussion 00:06, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Jason Steed

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:Fiction. Real-world context lacking to the point that if you missed reading one line you would mistake this for a real person. Most of the article is about the subject's father rather than the subject, and the article is basically a regurgitation of plot. The book itself might deserve an article if it has received sufficient coverage, but as the first in a series, an article for a single character is unwarranted (maybe in 5 books' time). dramatic (talk) 00:48, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't see anything but a long plot summary. ChildofMidnight (talk) 04:16, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete- devoting an entire article of 100% plot summary to a character in a series of books that's only borderline notable itself, is just excessive. This article falls well short of our standards of verifiability and notability. Reyk  YO!  10:29, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. We should have an article about the book, but I'm not convinced the character is important enough to warrant one. JulesH (talk) 19:21, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Entirely plot summary without real-world information. Notability not established via significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 05:07, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * USERFY back to author and request article about the book that would then contain some of this information.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 18:58, 19 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.