Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Thurmond Wilford-Anderson III


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was speedy flush as, well, nonsensical crap. Patent nonsense doesn't have to be what comes from 50 monkeys banging on the keyboard for an hour. This is just as bad. Kimchi.sg 21:01, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Jason Thurmond Wilford-Anderson III
Contested speedy. An article about a piece of crap. Somebody took a dump and named it, then wrote an article about it. No, I'm not kidding. Fan-1967 18:45, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Flush this one down so it can be Deleted Wildthing61476 18:47, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Whether or not the saga is true, this has no reason to be inside an enclopedia. Neither Wilford-Anderson, nor his dump have any notability, and the article is a bunch of nonsense. --Porqin 18:51, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep It's a good, full-length article. If people worked on it, it could become a featured article.  Tannerton 18:52, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The article doesn't maintain any sense, the article's title is purported to be the piece of fecal matter, and the dumper was Larry Wilson. Later in the article, "It remains to be seen whether someone else will be able to take a dump as big as Dr. Jason Thurmond Wilford-Anderson III, Ph.D." The fecal matter suddenly becomes the person. --Porqin 19:01, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * No, the article is saying that Wilford-Anderson is the dump. If it was referring to Wilford-Anderson as a person and not a dump it would say "as big as Dr. Jason Thurmond Wilford-Anderson did" instead of just "as big as Dr. Jason Thurmond Wilford-Anderson."  Jacketeer 19:07, 13 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep I tried to help create this article yesterday, but somebody deleted it with little warning.  Jacketeer 19:07, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete As nonsense, hoax, and previously deleted. --DarkAudit 19:13, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * delete There actually is at least one site on the web for things like this. But Wikipedia isn't it. Sanbeg
 * Delete and send to WP:BJAODN. --cholmes75 (chit chat) 20:30, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.