Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jasper Keith


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 22:40, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Jasper Keith

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable academic. Fails WP:PROF. Emeritus is not a distinguished chair, the Association for Clinical Pastoral Education is not a major society, WorldCat shows no significant books. Many unsourced promotional claims in the text.  DGG ( talk ) 18:16, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  19:51, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  19:51, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  19:51, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  19:51, 9 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - Seemingly nothing to even suggest somewhat of a better article yet, draft and userfy later if needed. SwisterTwister   talk  19:52, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete seems to have had a worthy career, but not a notable one.--Samuel J. Howard (talk) 15:26, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete -- claims seem acceptably written given the CV as source, but do not amount to a GNG or WP:PROF pass. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 18:34, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete fine article and career, but I'm not seeing anything to meet General Notability Guideline or Academic Notability Guideline. Alsee (talk) 21:17, 10 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.