Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaspreet Singh (architect)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:RS is indeed a policy; WP:N is another. The Bushranger One ping only 18:59, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Jaspreet Singh (architect)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No significant coverage in independent reliable sources to prove notability. The-Pope (talk) 17:17, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Please check new references added to the arcticle which enhance the overall article. Gibbletow 15:24, 2 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:21, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:21, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:21, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

(UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gibbletow (talk • contribs) Its easy to say its spam and self promotion and bla bla without even going in depth of the article or finding who the person is .Gibbletow 10:41, 6 November 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gibbletow (talk • contribs) <--Gibbletow 13:52, 6 November 2011 (UTC)!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 * Delete. Agree the The-Pope – no significant coverage in independent RSs, so does not pass the WP:GNG. Jenks24 (talk) 23:06, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. I have found relevant and verifiable reference and I have added it in the article at number 4 and 5 , please check  ,also I am looking for the reference in the magazine. Gibbletow 05:34, 1 November 2011 (UTC) — Gibbletow (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep added a link to an article published in 2010 in an independednt reliable source to prove notability ,the article also mentions about architect's famous community projects ,see ref citation number 6 in the article before making any decision.
 * Keep This article has been now enhanced with new verifiable references from reliable sources and also google search shown many hits for arcINOVATIONZ Gibbletow 12:52, 2 November 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gibbletow (talk • contribs)  — Gibbletow (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Comment You can only vote once. Bgwhite (talk) 06:32, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with Nom.  No reliable sources to be found. Bgwhite (talk) 06:35, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment Do not agree with Bgwhite ,there are reliable sources cited in the article  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gibbletow (talk • contribs) 06:45, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. Not notable, massive ad which is poorly written. Also he pretended to burn himself for attention (what a idiot attention free advertising seeker - kill the page) http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/indians-injuries-raise-questions/story-e6frg6nf-1225817870787 Ray-Rays 20:04, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Strongly disagree with speedy delete -wrong person reference
 * You've already stated that viewpoint several times. You've voted "keep" once, that's enough. Themanfromscene24 (talk) 05:21, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment wrong person reference mr Ray-Ray, if people like you are editors on Wikipedia then I may start up somewhere else . Get your facts right have a read through citations , there is a picture of architect Jaspreet singh with Indian PM published in a magazine article and the guy who set himself ablaze is a student in Australia . So who is the idiot here I think everyone can understand . Gibbletow 23:08, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Shameless self-promotion. Themanfromscene24 (talk) 05:21, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as SPAM. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:04, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment WP policy says you need to have a verifiable reference to a reliable source, I know its my first article but I have produced enough reference to satisfy the WP policies.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.