Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jasrotia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Lourdes  03:33, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Jasrotia

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I couldn't establish that they are WP:NOTABLE Boleyn (talk) 15:32, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:23, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:23, 25 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep: Meets WP:GNG. I have expanded the article a little and added few references; there are however much more available on Gbooks and JSTOR that anyone interested can make use of for further expansion. Anup   [Talk]  01:54, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep: this is another obvious keep that makes me question whether Boleyn did a WP:BEFORE in their recent spree of caste-related nominations. As says, there are plenty of sources out there. Most of them relate to the minor royalty that was at the heart of the community from ca 12C to 19C and might ultimately be covered better by a merge to or from  Jasrota (which I am presently expanding) but a deletion is inappropriate and any merge proposal can be dealt with when the expansion is complete. - Sitush (talk) 14:01, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep: Definitely keep. Meet notability guidelines. Article needs a lot of work, but no grounds to delete it. Will be good addition to wikipedia once article is further developed. Newtonslaw40 (talk) 15:36, 29 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.