Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jasser Haj Youssef


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Black Kite (talk) 21:33, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Jasser Haj Youssef

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems like a non-notable ad. Tagged for notability for 5 years. Boleyn (talk) 12:23, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 14:59, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 14:59, 17 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment - Google News searches provided this (French news article), this (talks about a new album), this, this, this (both brief mentions), this (brief review) and this (more in-depth than the other links). I'm not fluent with French but he certainly has not been ignored and it's possible additional sources may be Arabic. Curious if he received attention from British media, I searched at The Guardian, The Telegraph and BBC News but found nothing relevant but a search at La Presse de Tunisie provided this (brief mention for a 2011 event). If additional sources are found, I think this article would be a keeper but I'll establish my vote when other users have spoken. SwisterTwister   talk  21:34, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 02:24, 23 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep – there's a bucket full of notable & substantial references at fr:Jasser Haj Youssef. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 12:58, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - While the :fr: article has some broken references, the RFI and New Morning references there seem substantial enough to meet WP:GNG by a bit, and I would be surprised to find that the other links, if corrected, didn't provide additional evidence. --j⚛e deckertalk 19:48, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.