Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jassim bin Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber Al Thani


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is he's not a notable businessman. If it makes sense to mention the bid and therefore redirect this to Man United, that can be done editorially. Star  Mississippi  22:44, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Jassim bin Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber Al Thani

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Disputed dratification WP:ROTM Qatari businessman just doing his reasonably senior job and not shown to pass WP:GNG. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:40, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Qatar. 🇺🇦  Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:40, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
 * One thing at a time, please? There's been a requested move, a move review, and now the requested move is open again at Talk:Jassim bin Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber Al Thani.  I know there's no technical reason why we can't have both discussions going on at the same time, but the risk is that we might get incompatible outcomes, leading to some poor sysop having to resolve a "move" consensus in one discussion with a "delete" consensus in another.—S Marshall T/C 12:39, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I have closed the requested move discussion. AFDs before RMs. Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 02:51, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Don't agree with that action, considering the amount of sources that have been mentioned in the RM. AfD isn't more important or superior to other community processes. If we started closing RMs because an AfD has begun, then we're creating an incentive for the losing side to open an AfD as a spoiling tactic. That's not desirable. Please consider self-reverting.—S Marshall T/C 07:01, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I am a surprised that the article was renamed again when the relisted discussion was still open. Malia Green (talk) 09:51, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - Jassim bin Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber Al Thani is notable because he made a bid for Manchester United F.C. and many international sources are reporting about him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Malia Green (talk • contribs)
 * Keep - Per above. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 19:43, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
 * See WP:BLP1E. Bidding on a sports club does not make a subject notable.  // Timothy :: talk  01:01, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails GNG and BIO. BIO1E for the sport team bid, or NOTINHERITED from family. One of the sources states they are "little known". Money doesn't buy notability, neither do relationships. Nothing notable about their business career, which appears mostly to be a result of family connections, not independent notability. BLPs need clearly IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability to avoid abuse per well known core policy (WP:V and WP:BLP) and guidelines (WP:BIO and WP:IS, WP:RS, WP:SIGCOV).  // Timothy :: talk  00:59, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete as per WP:BLP1E. Take away the football club bid and you aren't left with much. LibStar (talk) 01:56, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * He made a bid of $5.3 billion for Manchester United F.C., which also put him ahead of his two rivals, Jim Ratcliffe and Thomas Zilliacus. International sources such as Bloomberg, Reuters, the BBC and others (see many sources that have been mentioned in the RM) are reporting on him and his bid. I think the article should not be taken down until the decision is made and he lose. Malia Green (talk) 09:48, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - outside the bid attempt, no in-depth coverage, fails WP:BIO1E. Onel 5969  TT me 18:48, 5 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.