Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jasun Mark


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – czar   08:08, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Jasun Mark

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BLP of an adult film director, resting almost entirely on primary and unreliable sources (IMDb, YouTube videos, etc.) Out of all the references here, #6 (the Charlottetown Guardian) is the only one that could even begin to get a person over WP:GNG — and even that article isn't about him, but merely namechecks his existence at the very end of an article about his father. The level of coverage needed to get him into Wikipedia simply hasn't been shown here. (This is also a WP:COI, as the creator's username matches the Twitter handle of a person directly employed in the public relations department of the same company that the article subject works for.) Delete, without prejudice against recreation in the future if it can be sourced properly. Bearcat (talk) 21:20, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:36, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:38, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:38, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:38, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 03:11, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete I failed to find any reliable sources which provided significant coverage. I fail to see how a gay porn blog even starts to get someone over GNG. I'm not convinced that this article could be recreated in a suitable state at the present time due to failing GNG. Winner 42 Talk to me!  07:18, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 09:24, 6 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete BLPs require much better than this. Spartaz Humbug! 08:40, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Clearly fails general notability. FoCuS contribs ;  talk to me!  01:37, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, A promotional article created by an SPA, and something of a sleeper at that. More likely than not this was created by one of the notorious sockmasters/paid editors active in this area. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 19:26, 12 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.