Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jat Airways Flight JU420


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Jat Airways. \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 20:50, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Jat Airways Flight JU420

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Aircraft over-runs end of runway, no-one hurt. This really does not have "historical notability" - fails WP:NOT and WP:AIRCRASH. The first is a contested PROD, we may as well take them both together. JohnCD (talk) 20:46, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  —JohnCD (talk) 21:09, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete both - I don't see that they meet the notability requirement in any way. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 20:55, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete (both) or Merge with Jat Airways in the "Incidents and accidents" section. Fails WP:AIRCRASH. Wikipedia is not a newspaper. Nothing indicates that this incident is notable as airplanes that skid off the runway are not rare, especially during poor weather conditions and when there are no fatalities or injuries. Jolenine  ( Talk  -  My Contribs ) 22:49, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete both, aircraft only suffered minor damage, adequately covered in Jat Airways article. Titles should be considered for conversion to redirects. Mjroots (talk) 07:22, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge to Jat Airways per WP:AIRCRASH. Bless you Thryddulf, wherever you are, for reforming those guidelines.  I would support the creation of a list of runway overruns for this and other non-fatal accidents that are in Category: Runway overruns; if it existed, I would support a longer mention there.  Mandsford (talk) 13:00, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge to Jat Airways because Jat is just such a cool word. But really, per WP:AIRCRASH and WP:COOLWORDS. --Triadian (talk) 05:28, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.