Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaungoikoa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Transwiki with soft redirect. Fritzpoll (talk) 17:35, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Jaungoikoa

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article is totally ethymological, so it would me better fit into wictionary. As far as I can see, it does not bring enough encyclopedic information to foster an entry Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 17:41, 22 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Question Did the nominator try to find references for the article on the internet? -- The Legendary   Sky Attacker  20:12, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Answer Yes, there are many references. But that's not the point. I think that this article is in its currents form unencyclopedic, because it features no stand-alone information. Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 20:25, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Transwiki as dicdef. So tagged. ChildofMidnight (talk) 04:53, 23 May 2009 (UTC)


 * I can't see an encyclopedic article being made out of of this. It's not an English word, so en.wiktionary doesn't have a place for this. The word is listed as an unverified translation on their page for God. Hmm, that said there is a very brief entry for Dieu. Let Wiktionary work out what to do with it. Fences and windows (talk) 01:16, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Pastor Theo (talk) 00:51, 29 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Soft redirect to wiktionary. Outright deletion's inappropriate because someone who doesn't know the word might very well look it up on Wikipedia; plausible search terms should not be redlinks.— S Marshall   Talk / Cont  02:05, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.