Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Javed Ahmad Ghamidi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. An obvious sock of User:Faizanhb2. First edit is an AfD, that's impossible, and it should be. (non-admin closure) Fai  zan  11:14, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Javed Ahmad Ghamidi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Reason False and fraud info given in references and in the text. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dasdadadadad (talk • contribs) 01:38, 4 July 2013‎ (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2013 July 4.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  01:55, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:07, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:07, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:07, 4 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. Sources are adequate. Tendentious nomination by spa. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:11, 4 July 2013 (UTC).
 * Keep The existing sources contain sufficient evidence of notability, for exampl "President Pervez Musharraf has refused to accept the resignation of Javed Ghamadi from the Council of Islamic Ideology" . In addition The Guardian describes the subject as a "reformist scholar and popular television preacher" AllyD (talk) 05:59, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment. I suggest a new rule for Wikipedia: prods and AfD nominations should not be accepted from editors with less than (say) 100 edits. Xxanthippe (talk) 06:05, 4 July 2013 (UTC).
 * Strong KEEP and speedy close as this AfD has no substance and was started by a sockpuppet blocked for spam and promo.  kashmiri TALK  08:46, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.